Where's Kelly? The cheerleader chick.

Furthermore, Radar should not accuse others of 'slipshod' reporting.

RADAR used a GAWKER STALKER sighting in order to get an 'exclusive' - pathetic:

http://www.gawker.com/news/radar/gawker-exclusive-how-a-radar-exclusive-gets-made-222936.php

I've also spotted misinformation on this blog several times and have witnessed Radar getting "scoops" from smaller blogs without giving them credit. I'll be going through my newsreader and see a story in a tiny blog - 20 minutes later Radar has the story up as an "EXCLUSIVE!". Kinda funny how that happens, eh? I find grammar/spelling errors on this blog constantly, but I never notice any on Gawker.

I like Radar Online, but they'll never be Gawker so they should just quit tryin'.

Emily acted like a lady, even though she was not treated like one. Had I been on that show - with a few men ganging up on me - I would've lost my cool and let the rage take over.

I would've been yelling: "LISTEN HERE, JIMMY BOY! LOOSEN THE SUSPENDERS & LET ME FINISH MY SENTENECE. I'M SORRY, DID I BREATHE AND GIVE YOU THE IMPRESSION I WAS FINISHED SPEAKING?"

I would've turned into a complete diva and made an ass out of myself.

Emily went the other route: she giggled, rolled her eyes, and remained calm.

What else could she have done? Kimmel wouldn't even let her get a sentence out, which is unfortunate. Had he let her speak, she would've been able to explain how Gawker works (as reflected in her post).

Kimmel was bitter because there was a recent post on Gawker saying that his girlfriend wasn't funny - everybody ripped Sarah Silverman a part in the comments (I sorta did too).

What's funny? Emily Gould did not make that post. She's a Silverman fan! Gould actually made a Gawker post saying she DID think Silverman was funny.

Kimmel dug up that old drunk sighting story and tried to act like that's what was bothering him. That post was made ages ago, but I'm considering making:

"WHEN ISN'T JIMMY KIMMEL INTOXICATED?"

Tee shirts now. That's a pretty good line, heh.

In the end, Kimmel has one less fan now (just when I was starting to like him, he acts the fool). I also think Silverman should consider her options at this point.

Her ex-boyfriends were so cool. She used to date David Cross - a FUNNY comedian. Cross even showed up at Jessica Coen's (former Gawker editor) birthday party!

TAKE NOTE, KIMMEL. Bloggers are not your enemeis, we can work with you.

But... why would any of this matter now?

Didn't Jolie recently make a promise to her child(ren) that she was going to stop making movies/being famous in order to be a better mother?

If I didn't just dream that, she should be trying to avoid ALL publicity - even the good. If I keep seeing her in movies in years to come, I'm going to have to buy into Us Weekly's trash.

Honestly, I think Mia Farrow is more of a "saint" than Jolie as far as actresses/humanitarians/adoption junkies go...

Farrow even went so far as to adopt children with disabilities - people seem to forget those children need loving homes the most.

That's something I'd like to see Jolie do (assuming she has it in her). She wants her family to be "diverse" remember?

Why doesn't the Terry Richardson photo get larger?

I suggest a re-upload with a larger Terry photo.

(And possibly with his pants off this time, thanks.)

Lemme guess: *your* was used instead of *you're* to emphasize how stupid Francis really is.