We got a free copy of your magazine & I'd like to ask about the Fabio-Clooney picture you have in the paper copy. In it you have Fabio in an eating establishment with a fairly dark, dim, grainy person in the back giving the finger, you then have a "lightened" inset of said person as Clooney giving the finger. I'd like to ask where the gentleman sitting across from Clooney is in the Fabio picture? Or the lamp behind Clooney's head (not to mention Clooney's sitting in the corner of the room & the yahoo behind Fabio is not) in the inset is in the photo with Fabio? Is Fabio's flowing locks covering the man, lamp and entire corner of the room, oops not if you're actually looking at the photo. Or how about the fact the two men (the dim image behind Fabio & Clooney in inset) have different hair outlines and are giving the camera the finger from different angles and positions. I'd just like to know, what "journalistic" ethics you hold yourselves to? Clooney got caught giving the dreaded finger, oh no. Why the lie about him doing it behind Fabio? I guess the story wasn't good enough unless he looked like an ass but you couldn't find anything good enough so you made it up? Guess what that makes you look like...?