briggs, you've identified the reason the Washington Post will never charge its readers for access to its own op-ed section. Readers quickly lose the daily habit of following the dissemblings of neocons like Jim Hoagland and the very nasty Charles Krauthammer.

In his trashing of Jimmy Carter's "Peace: Not Apartheid" the War-without-end-lobbyist, Jeffrey Goldberg labels Jimmy "famously pro-Palestinian" and even goes so far as to say he was critical of the saintly Golda Meir!

However, what Jeffrey really wants to call Jimmy, but isn't quite sure if the word still has any meaning, is "anti-semite."

He should ask David Brooks, who, in one of his New York Times columns, said that his critics used the word "neocon" as a code word for "Jewish."

In his trashing of Jimmy Carter's "Peace: Not Apartheid" the War-without-end-lobbyist, Jeffrey Goldberg labels Jimmy "famously pro-Palestinian" and even goes so far as to say he was critical of the saintly Golda Meir!

However, what Jeffrey really wants to call Jimmy, but isn't quite sure if the word still has any meaning, is "anti-semite."

He should ask David Brooks, who, in one of his New York Times columns, said that his critics used the word "neocon" as a code word for "Jewish."