Everyone is missing the main point - and that is that the main point of this article is false. I'll repeat it:

"Bill O'Reilly went right back to doing what he does best: contradicting himself."

The piece goes on to defend this view by stating that Bill calls child molesters sick but states some kids might like it.

Neither statement contradicts the other, both can exist as true. Even if it were true that some kids liked the abuse it wouldn't justify the abuse.

Now, if you want to attack Bill's statement that kids might sometimes like it, fine, but the article as it now stands is a complete waste of time.