In its lukewarm endorsement of Hillary Clinton back in January, the New York Times wrote that yes, the aspiring lady commander in chief is "more qualified, right now, to be president," but also that it's important for her to "take the lead in changing the tone of the campaign" before it gets too negative and divisive and makes people forget about whatever valid trump cards she might actually have over Barack Obama. An editorial in the Times today lets us know that they feel Hillary didn't exactly take their advice.