EXCLUSIVE: Lindsay Lohan's Lawyer In Last Ditch Meeting With Judge To Avoid Jail
Posted on Mar 09, 2011 @ 02:49PM
Lindsay Lohan's legal eagle, Shawn Holley, is meeting with Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Keith Schwartz's chambers at the LAX Airport Courthouse in a desperate bid to avoid jail time for the troubled star, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.
Deputy District Attorney Danette Meyers is at the meeting too.
PHOTOS: Lindsay & Little Sister Ali Drive Around Santa Monica
It began around 2:45 pm PST.
“Holly is trying to use the fact that the jewelry store owners sold the surveillance video to keep her client out of jail,” a source with knowledge of the case told RadarOnline.com.
PHOTOS: Lindsay's Sexy Photoshoot
“Or at least consider greatly reducing the six months that the DA is seeking for the probation violation.”
Lohan, 24, is scheduled to appear in front of Judge Schwartz Thursday and is expected to reveal whether she will take the plea deal, or go to trial.
PHOTOS: Celebs Who Have Done Jail Time
Story developing.
RELATED STORIES:
PHOTOS: Lindsay Gets Turned Away From a Party
- Beyonce's Returning To The Stage For The First Time Since Becoming A Mom — Huffington Post
- Sienna Miller & Her Baby Bump Are All Smiles — The Frisky
- Jay-Z To Score New "Annie" Movie Starring Willow Smith — Global Grind
- Simon Cowell Asks 'What Was I Thinking?' After Choosing Britney Spears & Demi Lovato for 'X Factor' — Celebuzz
- Anne Hathaway's Ex Raffaello Follieri Released from Jail — Just Jared
- Age Appropriate? Kylie Minogue, 43, Dons Racy Webbed Dress — Celebuzz
- Click Here & Join Our Facebook Page — Facebook
Sample Header
The Daily Juice
She has to be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt first before there is any probation violation. Once Lindsay
is found non guilty, that will be the end of all matters including probation against Lindsay.
Posted Thu, 03/10/2011 - 1:58am
Who the EFF CARES? She is a zero. Zero.
Go back and crawl in the hole you came out of. No one cares......
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:27pm
Radar, do a little bit of fact checking when you post. The ADA was at the meeting, too.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:12pm
Wrong Jill. While she won't go to jail tomorrow, she will more than likely be remanded to custody for probation violation when she appears in front of Sautner to plead not guilty to the theft charges.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:10pm
i didn't say anything that was wrong. she won't go to jail tomorrow, that's not wrong. and yes, if she's found in violation she would be remanded at that hearing.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:48pm
Did I say she was going to be remanded tomorrow? No, I did not. I said that she would be remanded when she appeared before Judge Sautner b/c the prelim and probation hearing would occur at the same time.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 9:50pm
i was answering someone that said she would go to jail tomorrow. you're the one that butted in.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 10:09pm
2) Lindsay isn't getting a break because the store did something bad - she's getting a break because now the prosecution can't necessarily prove guilt because it looks like the store set her up. It is VERY relevant.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 8:39pm
Lets get 2 things straight:
1) Even if Lindsay is innocent and could win at trial, she will STILL go to jail tomorrow and then risk trial - so that's why the plea deal is a good option if she wants to avoid jail above all.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 8:36pm
no she won't go to jail tomorrow. if she goes to trial, her violation hearing will be held at the same time. if she's found in violation, then she would go to jail but it's not happening tomorrow.
Posted Wed, 03/09/2011 - 8:49pm