EXCLUSIVE COURT DOCUMENTS: Jury Has Two Key Questions in Anna Nicole Smith Case


Posted on Oct 27, 2010 @ 01:58PM  
WENN.com

In what could be a troubling sign for the District Attorney in the Anna Nicole Smith drug case, the jury has two important questions for the judge, RadarOnline.com has learned.

EXCLUSIVE COURT DOCUMENTS:  Read More About The Jurors' Questions

According to court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, the first question is: "What should we do if we are unable to come to a verdict on a count or an object crime?"  This could be a bad sign indicating the jury could be deadlocked on certain charges against the trio.

The second question they are asking is: "If a juror were to believe that prescriptions were written in excessive amounts, does it follow that these prescriptions also have no legitimate medical purpose?"

EVIDENCE: Do These Photos Prove Anna Nicole Was Not A Drug Addict?

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Perry is expected to direct the jurors regarding their questions at 1:30 pm PT.

This is the jury's 12th day of deliberations.

PHOTOS: Stars Who OD'd

As RadarOnline.com has previously reported, Smith's former attorney Howard K. Stern, psychiatrist Khristine Eroshevich and medical internist Sandeep Kapoor are charged with conspiring to prescribe, administer and give substances to an addict.

All three have pleaded not guilty to to the charges.  They are not charged in Smith's 2007 accidental overdose death.

RELATED STORIES:

Larry Birkhead Takes The Stand In Anna Nicole Drug Trial

Trio Used Fake Names To Keep Anna Nicole Drugged Says Prosecutor

PHOTOS: Anna Nicole Smith’s Doctor Snorting A White Powder



Drs need to explain WHY they prescribed so many drugs - Howard didn't prescribe anything or force a grown 39 yr old woman to take anything she didn't want to take. she did what she wanted blame HER - not HKS

by Bree
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 5:57pm

There are also many other charges that should be brought up against him and his two idiots. Then they all should be brought up including Larry Birkhead on charges of lying under oath.

by winkles
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 5:45pm

I totally disagree w/you Smooch1 which is unusual. This should have been brought to trial only in a different way, It should have been Manslaughter on two counts. Son Daniel W Smith and Anna Nicole Smith.

by winkles
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 5:40pm

This case should have never been brought to trial. No case here for Howard. Same with Sandeep. Kristine has some culpability but still, not worth this overblown effort by the DA's office. And I don't care who the F is posting first here.

by Smooch1
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:36pm

Look at poster no. 1 here. What a dope. Read the rest of her posts around this website. Honestly, she's got the maturity level of a 10 year old girl.

by Smooch1
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 4:31pm

FIRST!

by Barbie Doll
Posted Wed, 10/27/2010 - 3:44pm

Sample Header

The Daily Juice