EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Uchitel Turned Down Second Playboy Deal Because Of New Lover
Posted on Sep 17, 2010 @ 06:30AM

They really want to see her naked.
RadarOnline.com has learned Playboy made a second offer to get Tiger Woods' ex-mistress in the nude, but this time, it was Rachel Uchitel herself who thwarted the chance for a slice of the spotlight.
NEW PHOTOS: Life's A Beach For Tiger Woods' Mistress Rachel Uchitel
"The magazine came back to Rachel recently with another generous offer to appear in the magazine," said a source, close to Uchitel.
"At the time, Rachel had started to date a new man, and she was embarrassed to go ahead with the spread, because she was afraid that it would upset him.
EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS: Tiger's Mistress Rachel Uchitel Posed Topless
"She didn't even tell the guy at the time, but felt uncomfortable, because she believed it would have been detrimental to a relationship that she would rather pursue than being on the cover of a magazine naked."
Uchitel told friends at the time, "I'd rather take a leap of faith and give this guy a shot!"
PHOTOS: Rachel Uchitel At The Hamptons In 2007
Even though the romance didn't last and with the interest in a topless spread still high, Uchitel "doesn't feel like it's appropriate for her to do it" according to the source.
"She is happy with the decisions she made," the source said.
PHOTOS: Tiger And His Wife Through The Years
As RadarOnline.com revealed, the philandering golfer nixed Uchitel's first Playboy deal - which was worth up to $300,000.
The journalist-turned-hostess-turned-mistress, who has also admitted to having a 'romantic relationship' with married Bones star David Boreanaz, would have appeared "totally naked except her pubic area", according to a contract that was presented to her.
EXCLUSIVE: Tiger Woods In Sex Rehab
The photos would have shown bare breasts and backside nudity, it said.
The magazine wanted to feature the 35-year-old former New York club hostess on the cover along with a direct mention of the cheating golfer.
PHOTOS: Official Photos Of Tiger's Wrecked Car
But the deal - which Uchitel sources insist was being orchestrated by advisors, not her - was thwarted because it "put Rachel in significant danger of losing the millions of dollars Tiger paid her," said one source.
BIKINI PHOTOS: Uchitel Strolls On Beach While Tiger Divorces
RELATED STORIES:
EXCLUSIVE: Tiger Woods Stopped Rachel Uchitel's $300K Nude Magazine Deal
EXCLUSIVE: Elin 'Relieved & Distraught' After Divorce From Tiger
EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Uchitel Leaves Sober Living For Ground Zero














This is all BS, Playboy probably did not want Uglitel after realizing that this W*H*O*R*E* is very unpopular and hated by millions and she may be saying this to save face!!!
Posted Sat, 09/18/2010 - 5:19pm
I don't want to see her naked. She has 2 breasts & a vagina.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 2:33pm
Yes, she is the most digusting woman on this planet. She is predatory and has no respect for anything or anyone. I wish her all bad things to come.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 1:45pm
Truth is that Playboy wanted to mention Tiger on their cover and in her proposed layout and that would have been against the agreement she signed to get the 10 mil she extorted from Tiger Woods. He is not to be mentioned - EVER. That's the truth.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 1:44pm
Oh yeahshe is worried her boyfriend might get mad? So she has morals of a sudden? Giime a break ? Mybe she is worries someone;s wife might come and smack her upside the head...Yeah she has morals alright, please...once a ho always a ho
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 1:39pm
Ick. This woman makes my skin crawl.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 12:31pm
Given her behavior and choices during and since cheating with Tiger, including cheating with other famous married men, I'd guess her actions are driven by a strong sense of integrity but fear of losing her lucrative payoff.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 11:58am
If this is true, her meaning of integrity and the rest of the world are miles apart. She is looking out for #1 and will do whatever is necessary to keep her name in the public eye and take whatever money is available.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 1:10pm
This woman would not know the truth if it bit her in her ***. Sometimes wonder how she keeps her story straight. If this so called "new man" didn't know her history before - she is delusional.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 11:46am
She couldn't have a direct mention of Tiger without violating their financial agreement. I knew her "I've beome virtuous" story just didn't add up.
Posted Fri, 09/17/2010 - 10:42am