EXCLUSIVE: Katherine Jackson To Debbie Rowe In Court Battle -- You Want Too Much


Posted on Sep 03, 2010 @ 01:15PM  
Landov/Pacific Coast News

Katherine Jackson has formally filed court documents objecting to the amount of money Debbie Rowe is seeking from Michael Jackson's estate.

READ THE DOCUMENT: Katherine Jackson To Debbie Rowe In Court Battle -- You Want Too Much

Rowe is seeking close to $200,000 in attorney's fees she says were incurred as a result of the custody case involving Michael Jackson's children after the King Of Pop died last year.

Katherine Jackson's family law attorney, Diane Goodman states in court docs, "petitioner (Katherine Jackson), contends that the amount of fees requested by Debbie Rowe is not reasonable.”

The filing adds, “Wherefore, Petitioner requests that the petition for Approval for Attorney's Fees be denied if determined by the court to be unreasonable. Other relief be granted that the court deems just and proper."

PHOTOS: Katherine Jackson Holds Memorial For King Of Pop In His Hometown

Rowe is represented by Eric George, who also was Oksana Grigorieva's attorney in the early stages of the custody battle with Mel Gibson over their infant daughter, Lucia.

A hearing is set for September 8, 2010, to determine how much money George will get for his work with Rowe.

RELATED STORIES:

Katherine Jackson Attends The Michael Jackson Memorial Celebration in Gary, Indiana

EXCLUSIVE: Michael Jackson's Alleged Son Planning To Join Wrongful Death Lawsuit

EXCLUSIVE: Joe Jackson Financially Exploiting Wife Katherine



I never trusted Debbie. And let me just say this: BIRTH DOES NOT MAKE YOU A MOTHER. Get away from MJ's kids.

by Tinkerbells
Posted Sun, 09/05/2010 - 8:03am

@You have got to... seriously,check your facts! MJ is their biological dad,and Debbie is their biological mom,accept it and move on.

by Learnthefacts
Posted Sat, 09/04/2010 - 11:00pm

Anybody that ugly don't need no money........

by puppyluv1
Posted Fri, 09/03/2010 - 9:21pm

Why didn't Rowe take her children?????This bull crap keep the 3 together is just a excuse...

by starlight
Posted Fri, 09/03/2010 - 6:16pm

Probably because she doesnt have the money to fight the Jacksons. Didnt she give up all rights to the children to begin with?

by Silly Rabbit
Posted Mon, 09/06/2010 - 9:00am

She was a paid surrogate. She made the deal before they were born. Definitely a sperm donor was used and maybe someone else's eggs.

by You have got to...
Posted Fri, 09/03/2010 - 6:27pm