Jon & Kate -- Plus A Judge: Gosselins To Face-Off In Court Wednesday Over Missing Money
Posted on Oct 07, 2009 @ 05:00AM

UPDATE: Today's hearing has been canceled because the judge's wife died of cancer early Wednesday morning. Next week, they'll set a new date.
Jon and Kate Gosselin are set to face off Wednesday morning in a Montgomery County courtroom in Pennsylvania over Kate's claims that Jon withdrew $230,000 from their joint bank account without her consent.
As RadarOnline.com was first to report, Kate filed papers with the court on Monday demanding that Jon sell his two luxury cars and reimburse their joint bank account with the money she claims he stole. She's also demanding that Jon pay $5,000 in court fees.
VIDEO: Jon Gosselin Spars With Nancy Grace
Kate says Jon wiped out their savings, leaving only $1,000 in the account. She claims she can't pay her bills.
Jon left Los Angeles Tuesday afternoon after a whirlwind media blitz. When asked if he was planning to give the money back, he replied curtly: "I didn't take it."
NEW PHOTOS: Nanny Takes Gosselin Kids To School, Again
Kate's attorneys are also asking Jon be held on contempt charges for withdrawing the funds without consenting Kate first -- which he was legally required to do per an arbitrator's ruling when the couple filed for divorce in June.
America's Next Top Model: Jon Gosselin?
RadarOnline.com will continue to bring you breaking developments in the Jon & Kate saga as they happen.















If anyone has online banking and write checks, you would know that you can view your checks online. The bank also post your withdrawal slip to your account. So, why didn't Kate print out her proof?
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 1:36pm
The truth is Kate did mislead the public about her financial status.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:48am
Everyone should stop speculating. We only know their 2 sides; then there's the truth. We'll know that next week.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:42am
LOL Pevans - sorry, but that's pretty much what we do here! ( :
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:06am
I thought today the judge will hand down his ruling...now it's a hearing. I think there is a difference. The judge would be needed if either party disputes his ruling....?????
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:58am
If all those reports of conference calls were true...he has talked to J & K or their lawyers.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:01am
What is amusing is the Judge has reviewed Kates claims. If they were in contempt of their agreement, Jon would have been ordered to pay back immediately. Which he was not. He would also be facing Jail time.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:38am
Not necessarily true - they had a conference call. We don't know what that entailed.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:03am
so after the conference call he still wasnt ordered to replace the money. They wouldn't need a hearing if their were loopholes in her claims.
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:18am
Sadly some people just don't get it
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:19am