Jon & Kate -- Plus A Judge: Gosselins To Face-Off In Court Wednesday Over Missing Money


Posted on Oct 07, 2009 @ 05:00AM  
DNP Random Things
WENN

UPDATE: Today's hearing has been canceled because the judge's wife died of cancer early Wednesday morning.  Next week, they'll set a new date.

Jon and Kate Gosselin are set to face off Wednesday morning in a Montgomery County courtroom in Pennsylvania over Kate's claims that Jon withdrew $230,000 from their joint bank account without her consent.

As RadarOnline.com was first to report, Kate filed papers with the court on Monday demanding that Jon sell his two luxury cars and reimburse their joint bank account with the money she claims he stole. She's also demanding that Jon pay $5,000 in court fees.

VIDEO: Jon Gosselin Spars With Nancy Grace

Kate says Jon wiped out their savings, leaving only $1,000 in the account. She claims she can't pay her bills.

Jon left Los Angeles Tuesday afternoon after a whirlwind media blitz. When asked if he was planning to give the money back, he replied curtly: "I didn't take it."

NEW PHOTOS: Nanny Takes Gosselin Kids To School, Again

Kate's attorneys are also asking Jon be held on contempt charges for withdrawing the funds without consenting Kate first -- which he was legally required to do per an arbitrator's ruling when the couple filed for divorce in June.

America's Next Top Model: Jon Gosselin?

RadarOnline.com will continue to bring you breaking developments in the Jon & Kate saga as they happen.



If anyone has online banking and write checks, you would know that you can view your checks online. The bank also post your withdrawal slip to your account. So, why didn't Kate print out her proof?

by Arch
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 1:36pm

The truth is Kate did mislead the public about her financial status.

by Mia
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:48am

Everyone should stop speculating. We only know their 2 sides; then there's the truth. We'll know that next week.

by pevans01
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:42am

LOL Pevans - sorry, but that's pretty much what we do here! ( :

by MrsD
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:06am

I thought today the judge will hand down his ruling...now it's a hearing. I think there is a difference. The judge would be needed if either party disputes his ruling....?????

by HB
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:58am

If all those reports of conference calls were true...he has talked to J & K or their lawyers.

by HB
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:01am

What is amusing is the Judge has reviewed Kates claims. If they were in contempt of their agreement, Jon would have been ordered to pay back immediately. Which he was not. He would also be facing Jail time.

by mlatts
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:38am

Not necessarily true - they had a conference call. We don't know what that entailed.

by MrsD
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:03am

so after the conference call he still wasnt ordered to replace the money. They wouldn't need a hearing if their were loopholes in her claims.

by mlatts
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:18am

Sadly some people just don't get it

by Texas_Jewel
Posted Wed, 10/07/2009 - 9:19am