Source: Jon Gosselin Needs To Watch Out For Nanny Stephanie Santoro


Posted on Sep 02, 2009 @ 02:30PM  
DNP Random Things Pics
INF Daily

Jon Gosselin’s  nanny and possible gal pal Stephanie Santoro is unfit to look after the Jon And Kate Plus 8 kids, according to one mom who spoke exclusively to RadarOnline.com about her relationship with the attractive brunette.

Kate Gosselin recently blew a gasket when she discovered that the cocktail waitress and single mom was helping Jon look after their eight kids at their home in Wernersville, PA.

“I don’t blame Kate for getting mad. Stephanie is irresponsible in my opinion,” revealed the mom exclusively to RadarOnline.com.

“She helped babysit my kids once with a friend of ours and she ended-up going-on my computer without my permission and nearly destroying it.

Stephanie has a young daughter of her own through a relationship that did not pan out and it’s her parents that spend most of the time looking after the child. She is always out doing one thing or another and the parents take the kid around with them all the time. To think that she could possibly be responsible for looking after eight kids belonging to someone else is just not practical, she’s still too young and immature.”

Santoro, 23, is currently living back at her parents’ home and is supposed to be working part time at a child’s clothing store as well as at Legends bar where she met and became friends with Jon.

But she harbors ambitions to become a model and believes that being associated with the womanizing reality dad could help put her in the public spotlight.

Our source added: “Her parents spent a fortune on getting studio photographs for her and she is determined to make it in modeling.

Stephanie lost a lot of weight and got a complete make-over and she knows that she is an attractive woman and how to work-it.”

Our source added this warning : “Jon Gosselin better watch out because she is ambitious and is  all about the money when it comes to getting involved with him. If Stephanie thought that he could financially look after her then she would totally go for that right now.  She believes that she deserves a better life than the one she’s currently got.”



well I think your a dummy to jane doe! who are you fake lying a-- hailey with the big nose and the nasty looking shape... crack head

by mara123
Posted Sat, 09/05/2009 - 3:14pm

What's wrong with this man! He has probably flouted every custody recommendation given to him by his attorney. Someone this foolish should not be responsible for caring for these young children, even with a "helper."

by hersheymom10
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 8:54pm

In Pa, if you need to leave you kids during scheduled time, you call the other parent before you hire a sitter (of any quality). Many judges favor "right of first refusal" here. Judges go to the grocery store just like everyone else!

by hersheymom10
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 8:44pm

The young model may have her hands full with her own child, but I'm sure caring for 8 more must be a snap. Why worry about any qualifications? She needed some extra money right? Great priorities.

by hersheymom10
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 8:23pm

When selecting a nanny what should a parent of 8 children look for? Someone with a background in education? CPR and first aid certificates? Some coursework related to young children? Well-seasoned mother?

by hersheymom10
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 8:17pm

WHO IS THIS, "ONE MOM "AS A "SOURCE"? STUPID RADARONLINE!
*
TEAM JON !!!!

by JANE DOE
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 7:24pm

Oink, Oink. Here little piggy. Worthless, ****monger of a slob, that pretty much sums up Jon Gosselin. Feel like you need to shower after seening a picture of him!

by realmom
Posted Thu, 09/03/2009 - 6:50pm

HOW GROWN UP OF YOU
AND YOU ARE A MOM? HA!

by JANE DOE
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 10:01pm

YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT FAKE LYING KATE!

by JANE DOE
Posted Fri, 09/04/2009 - 7:24pm

Jon smart? When? Where? I must have missed it. Actually its impossible! everytime he opens his mouth sheer stupidity is losed!

by Go Jane
Posted Thu, 09/03/2009 - 6:23pm