Debbie Rowe Breaks Down After Watching Jackson Memorial

Bookmark and Share

Posted on Jul 08, 2009 @ 10:00AM  
DNP Random Things

Debbie Rowe breaks down crying at her horse ranch in Palmdale, California Tuesday after seeing her young daughter Paris speaking at Michael Jackson’s public memorial.

Like millions of people around the world, Rowe watched the memorial on television.  She earlier said her attendance there would be a distraction.

Rowe married to the superstar singer in November, 1996. They divorced three years later, and Jackson took full custody of the couple’s two children, Paris and Prince Michael.  Jackson later added a third child, Blanket, to his family.

X17 Onlilne


Comments

Debbie is the biological mother, but as you can tell by looking at the kids, Michael was not the biological father of any of them. Debbie has said many times, that all she wanted to do was to give Michael some kids. She is the real mother.

by Chacooe
Posted Thu, 07/09/2009 - 11:24am

Debbie Rowe - IS NOT THE MOTHER!!! Serogate does not count!!! She carried someother womans fertilized egg. Her DNA is not the same as those children.That is the reason why she has no natural motherly instinct toward those children.

by msve1
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 6:33pm

YOU HAVE A GOOD POINT THERE....THE WHOLE ISSUE IS SO CONFUSING! WHO IS WHO & FROM WHERE! I PRAY THAT THE KIDS DON'T HEAR OR SEE NOTHING!....ROWE'S SELFISHNESS WON'T HURT THE KIDS BY COMING IN 2 THEIR LIVES 4 CUSTODY! IT'S ONLY 4 $$$$

by BE PASSIONATE O...
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 7:28pm

KIDS LIVED IN A SPECIAL ENVIROMENT W/THEIR FATHER THE ONLY PARENT KNOWN! ALONG W/GRANMOM, AUNTS, UNCLES & COUSINS! THEY NEED 2 STAY W/THEM @ALL COST! ROWE HAD NO PERSONAL CONTACT! YOU CAN SEE THE LOVE OFTHE SIBLINGS, HUGS, HOLDING HANDS & KISSES

by BE PASSIONATE O...
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 5:30pm

Agreed, Lyn. If D.R. stated she didn't attend the memorial because she didn't want to be a distraction, why did she sit outside to watch this, in full view of the public? No way should she have those kids!

by Stef
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 3:07pm

I THINK THAT DEBBIE ROWE SHOULD GET CUSTODY OF THE KIDS.

by tashalyn
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 3:02pm

it is obvious that michaels children belong with his family, they are loving and have many siblings, grandma, aunts and uncles to be there for the kids. debbie has a vile side of herself that would not be healthy for the children to be around.

by lyn
Posted Wed, 07/08/2009 - 2:01pm

Sign in to post a comment here.