|
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence Is Rielle Hunter the National Enquirer's Source?The four new pieces: • Edwards didn't confess until after a campaign staffer walked in on him and Hunter having an "intimate moment" in hotel room. Word eventually got to Elizabeth Edwards, who then confronted John, who then admitted the whole thing. But this all happened after he'd already declared his candidacy for the presidency. • The whole public tango over the DNA test, with Edwards saying he wants one and Hunter saying she doesn't: choreographed! • Texas lawyer Fred Baron is still sending $15,000 a month to Rielle and $20,000 a month to alleged baby fall guy Andrew Young. (The New York Post has a reporter in Raleigh who interviewed a bunch of Young's neighbors; all pretty much expressed doubt that Young fathered the baby, but say he's loyal enough to Edwards to shoulder responsibility. • Edwards last week called Hunter to tell her, "Of course I love you. Don't worry, we'll get through this." As for how the Enquirer keeps getting access to information such as the intimate details of a private phone call while other major media outlets who have now devoted significant time and resources to the story still can't prove anything, Sharon Waxman ventures the obvious: they pay for stuff! We mentioned back on Wednesday that Hunter herself very well might be squeezing cash out of both Edwards and the Enquirer, and that the whole thing with her weird mystic friend Robert McGovern setting up the Beverly Hilton meeting had the faint whiff of blackmail gone awry. Writes Waxman: "Imagine if Hunter was blackmailing Edwards for money—or, for more money, since she was already being paid a monthly stipend. And if she were pressuring him by leaking information to the National Enquirer. And if she tipped off the Enquirer to the July meeting, including such details as the number of rooms rented, and who was in them." Imagine if it was Hunter who sold the Enquirer the blurry photo of John Edwards holding the baby of indeterminate paternity that David Perel declined to offer any details about, including who took it, or where, when, or how it was taken! (He told CNN last week that we can "presume" he paid for it.) Edwards is probably wishing Hunter weren't so ambitious right around now. I have thought that since the beginning. Also, she has a tenuous connection to the Enquirer - her former father in law (a DA in Colorado) gave a declaration in support of the Ramseys to enjoin the Enquirer from publishing a story linking Jon Benet's death to her older brother. In any event, it seems clear that she has an airtight settlement agreement with Edwards, probably with a staggering liquidated damages clause, but he certainly isn't going to go to court to enforce it and she would be a fool to jeopardize the monthly stipend. Good work on all this, Neel. Posted by: karion on August 14, 2008 1:45 PM Advertisement |
|
|
||