We have a name for woman like this! "Your Slutness"

I think calling names is ever right, as in using the word 'slutness'.

However, anyone connected to the bringing us the news in anyway should be held to a higher moral character in everyway. We should be able to trust their character.

Yet we hold the likes of Brittany Spears, and who ever else the papparazzi is chasing this week to be role models, they are just entertainers and should have no other effect on our lives.

I need to know the people I am trusting to deliver "the truth" do have a higher moral content.

Reporters have no problem with invading other peoples privacy and telling the world about it (with their own slant of course). So...I have no problem with all the attention given to a "reporter" with all the juicy details.

Why souldn't her baggae be made public, are they above the law.
They the reporters ruin lives, and also tell lies to inhance their carrers, I have no pity for them.

I do not believe that any one's private life should be public fodder. What if all of a sudden secretaries were chosen to be written about? Would that all of a sudden change everyone's mind? Just because someone has a public persona such as actors, newspeople, weathermen, etc. does not mean that their personal life should become public as well. However, those that make laws for the people (which is bull___ any way) should be made public and I say that only because I do not want a morally bankrupt person making policy on my behalf. You see - making laws and reporting the news are two entirely different spheres and if I need to explain that further to any one, well......

This wou;d be laughable if it weren't so pathetic! A news reporter whining about HER dirty laundry being aired? She'll take the high road? That's gotta be a first....normally they're the ones scrounging for the dirty laundry!

Shame on her, now the shoe is on the other foot. She should not be treated any differently, white trash is white trash. The world may be closing around her but her legs are wide open.
She has lost all respect from her followers. I'll have to look to other news stations.

Here is what I say from experience. She hit on my boyfriend in a few countries, who is also a federal contractor, in the past. I think she has been looked at on ethical issues for the things she's done to get stories. There are far greater rumors about her than that. This story is no big shock to any contractor who has dealt with hr overseas...

I have always had respect for Lara Logan, and I will continue to do so. How dare anyone judge her. She spent many months in Iraq covering the news. Putting herself in danger so we could know the truth behind this ugly war. Everyone needs a little love and compassion, so why begrudge Lara this happiness. I pray she has a healthy baby and I wish her the best.

The life of a reporter should be just as much "fair game" as the lives of those they cover. However, I really believe we are told more information about celebrities than we should care about. Maybe if we stopped giving them so much publicity, the truly obnoxious ones (Brittany, Paris, etc.) might realize they aren't really that important. It would be nice to see more focus on people who do something worthwhile rather than those who think child abandonment, alcoholism, drug use, etc. are lifestyles worthy of our praise.

Logan is a celebrity in the public eye. Arguably, the private lives of big shot reporters are fair game given that these professional leeches make their living ferriting out and exposing the public and private lives of public and private citizens for major $$bucks and career advancements. Does anyone seriously believe had this been a Hollywood film star, Donald Trump, a big shot in the Bush adminstration (Condi?), or high profile U.S. military in Iraq that Logan and CBS would have kept it under wraps on the grounds of "privacy"? If extreme libs like married 37 year old Logan can't practice safe sex and be responsible when it comes to "unplanned" pregnancies with married men how does she and her Planned Parenthood ilk expect the underage kids they are habitually peddling condoms to in the public schoolds to be?

We would be a lot better off if the enquirer didn't print most of the things they do, but if you can't take it, don't dish it. Reporters being immune to their lives being public when they screw up? Ha. No pity here. Maybe it'll make reporters think long and hard about reporting the whole story instead of an editorial about whats going on. Start reporting both sides of the story factually and as accurately as possible, then I might 'tsk, tsk' the character bashing. Until then I don't see any character worth standing up for.