left arrow BackNext right arrow
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence

Users Complain that Facebook, Like Herpes, Just Doesn't Go Away

facebook.jpg
LIFETIME MEMBER Facebook
Facebook's invasive Beacon advertising platform isn't the only aspect of the company that is raising privacy concerns. According to a story in today's New York Times, the Palo Alto-based outfit has made it dam near impossible for users to delete unwanted accounts, infuriating a lot of those who no longer want their Pokes and wall posts and e-mail addresses broadcast to friends and colleagues online.

It seems those who wish to remove themselves from Facebook's archives must first undertake a Herculean series of tasks ranging from individually deleting every piece of information in their profiles to sending e-mails to Facebook representatives requesting permanent deletion—and even then might not be successful. "It's like the Hotel California," a user who tried for two months to delete his account tells the Times. "You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave."

In fact, it is apparently so difficult to get off the social-networking site that a group, "How to permanently delete your Facebook account," has been set up to provide detailed instructions outlining exactly how to do so. According to the group, achieving permanent deletion is an arduous, four-step process that takes about a week, though some of the people cited in the Times piece were able to delete their accounts only after placing multiple calls to Facebook higher-ups and threatening legal action.

Why would Facebook make it so difficult to leave? The official company line is so that deserters, should they decide to return, will be able to pick up where they left off. More alarmingly, though, it seems like yet another attempt by Facebook to retain valuable demographic information on users that it can sell to advertisers (assuming, of course, the company ever comes up with a way to monetize the information in the first place).

This isn't the first time the Times has had beef with Facebook being less than open about its conduct: A November 2007 blog posting by Louise Story took the site to task for lying about whether its bumbled Beacon advertising initiative would be opt-in.

Comments

have herpes?

Posted by: herpesfinder on March 28, 2008 3:43 AM

Advertisement


Post a comment

Your comment will not be visible for about a minute. If you don't see your comment when the page reloads, do not post it again. Reload the page in a minute, and you'll see it.

 


Happy Independence Day From Radar

One Last Bear Rub To Round Out The Week

Southampton's $27 Vodka Soda

The First-Ever Vagina Spa

WSJ Prepares For Fourth of July With Insanity!

Mario Lopez Remains Partially Clothed, For Now

Rate Cuts At Gawker Media

C-Rod and A-Rod No Mas

McCain Likely Furious About McCain Rage Stories

Zimbabwe: How The Torturers Live


EXECUTIVE EDITOR:


MANAGING EDITOR:


CONTRIBUTORS:
, , and others


Email us at:
tips@radaronline.com
or IM: TipRadar







Games of Chaunce
New York's biggest gossip source is just an average schmo from Jersey

Confronting the Douchebag Plague
A helpful guide from the forthcoming handbook Hot Chicks With Douchebags

Full Court Press
Charles Kaiser on standout journalism in the latest New Yorker and this week's winners and sinners

RadLibs: This American Life Edition
Create your own Ira Glass narration with Radar's This American Life story generator

I, 'Mobot
A brief history of gay androids





Those Are Some Large Mammaries
Here's to firecrackers, beer, hot dogs, and, um, breasts

IT Would Rather Slap You Upside the Head
Why? Because you're dumb, period

Pixar's Next Effort
A post-WALL-E masterpiece

Douchiest Phone Message Ever
Now we've heard it all

From the Notebook of a Disturbed Child
A tragic tale drawn simple