Is Details editor Dan Peres having aging issues? A look back at his magazine's past four "Most Influential Under X Age" issues (Ed. note: honorees not necessarily influential) reveals that Peres, 36, has progressively jacked up the cut-off age for inclusion on the list.

For this year's list, on which cover boy and knock-up artist Kevin Federline somehow lands at No. 7, the cut-off age was 45. (Our favorite coverline from the issue: "ARE YOU TURNING YOUR KID INTO A DOUCHEBAG?" If you are taking parenting tips from Details, yes, probably!) In 2006, it was 42. In 2005, it was 39. In 2004, it was a spring chicken-esque 37.

What is self-identifying douchebag Peres saying here? That by incrementally increasing the age under which one is defined as "young," he's created a loophole for himself to remain young in perpetuity, thus allowing him to pretend to be an accurate assessor of what's cool forever and ever? Or, in fitting with the thrust of most Details theories, that getting older probably makes you gay, and should thus be avoided at all cost? Toss-up!