Thank you, John Cook, for continuing to expose Phillip J. Eide aka Xavier Von Erck as the uneducated mongrel he is in real life.

Everyone knows Xavier and all the Perverted-Justice people have child porn on their computers for extended periods of time.

Being mere citizens gives them no right to create child porn by using pictures of kids taken from web sites to create fake profiles.

Greg Brainer aka Jay Alternative from Perverted Justice has admitted in court that he CREATES fake child porn profiles with photos taken from adoption sites in order to entice men with them.

Come out, come out where ever you are, pedos. Try and use any legal tricks you can. We all want to know who you are and where you are, for we know what you are. You are the destroyers of lives and the robbers of childhood. You may think that in the post sexual revolution era, you can normalize your activities. Thank God, however, that everyone else understands the concept of "concenting adults". If any pedo wishes to remain in society, then they should find a way to control or inhibit their tendencies. If they don't, then I applaud any and all efforts to remove them from society. We see you, pedo, and there is nothing good about you. For everyone else, ask yourself this question. If you could cure all disease, but to do so you must torture to death one child, would you do it? If you answer no, then why would you tolerate anything from a child rapist? If you answered yes, then I truely hope that you are only a sociopath and not a pedophyle.

You have got to be joking. Von Erck is a "creepy, and exceedingly pudgy vigilante"???? I admit to catch a predator is creepy but duhhh - look at the content. It's about sexual predators. Really clever how you spin this around to make it almost seem like Von Erck is some sort of pedophile creep. It's almost as if you wish he would get caught red handed raping some poor child. It doesn't matter how these disgusting freaks get caught. Why do you care about the rights of pedophiles?? Would be or otherwise? These people destroy lives and all you can do is critique the entertainment value of the program. Don't you understand that if this program prevents even one child from having some monster destroy their life, it is well worth having to put up with CHris Hanson's nasally, hackneyed, repetitive performances. In other words, this is more important than art, ethical journalism (whatever that is these days), and media personality, or whether you find someone's physical attributes appealing or not. Perhaps John Cook would sing a different tune if one of his children, nephews, or nieces had their souls ripped apart by one of these monsters. I say expose and take these bastards down by any means necessary.

Hey John Cook,
sounds like you might be a little scared you may be "trapped" next. Does Perverted Justice put a hold on any of your future plans?

That dude totally looks like he has little girl panties in his pocket.

Listener,
Your social cleansing aside, I think you should reconsider your "torture to death one child," philosophy. It has nothing at all to do with the present topic of soliciting felonies. What makes what this show different from a person soliciting a hit-man to kill someone? There is a difference between sociopaths and pedoPHILES. Sociopaths want to kill everyone who they deem "unfit to live," or in your case, "pedophyles."
"PedoPHILE," in the proper spelling here, is an incorrect term. It might make people think of terrible things like the word nazi, commie, or faggot; but it is not applicable. A person is only a pedophile if they are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children. If the children are post-pubescent (12 or 13) then they are called Ephebophiles, not pedophiles. It is tough to actually use the correct word, especially when it doesn't immediately make people angry.

Fleshyglassbits,
I don't know how you were raised, but "Why do you care about the rights of pedophiles?? " Seriously? Do you think that pedophiles are not people? Don't they deserve every legal protection that you do? Or is it that you can't use logic and empathy to understand this person's problems? I am not condoning pedophilia or don't you think that they are similar to a thief or murderer, they ruined someone's life, and will be punished using the justice system we have. Not some vigilantes who would use "any means necessary" to stop what is a criminal of a very emotional crime?

I ask that you use logic and empathy instead of pure, knee-jerk emotion to consider these criminals instead of people who should forever be banished from society, or worse. We should not tolerate these terrible crimes, but we should not respond by the murdering and massacring these criminals.