left arrow BackNext right arrow
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence

Ron Paul, Against All Odds

ron-paul-225-74412187.jpg
ON THE CONTRARY Ron Paul (Photo: Getty Images)
That Ron Paul fancies himself a bit of a maverick is no mystery. But just how renegade can one sitting member of Congress in an earnest bid for the presidency really be? In 10 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives, the elvish Texan has been the lone dissenter on dozens of congressional votes. Some reflect his distaste for foreign aid, others his desire for small government and his strong, nearly pathological, commitment to state's rights. All, however, reveal that the rogue candidate might not be striving for the beloved bipartisanship of the other candidates.

[After the jump, a run-down of some Dr. No's most notorious lonely votes!]

Notable Votes
Awarding Rosa Parks a Congressional Gold Medal (424-Ron Paul): Though he has "great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks," Paul does not agree with constitutional authorization for awarding the medal or prefer its $30,000 price tag. He's also been the lone dissenter in resolutions awarding the medal to Pope John Paul II, Ronald Regan, and Charles Schultz.

Restrictions on spam (427-Ron Paul): He argued that restricting spam was a violation of free speech and that some people are interested in getting good deals on Viagra.

Ban against eavesdropping on private phone calls (414-Ron Paul): Paul opposed the measure because it is the responsibly of the states to regulate such issues, and because the bill banned not just using, but possessing the eavesdropping equipment.

Financial Anti-Terrorism Act (412-Ron Paul): Of the precursor to the Patriot Act, Paul said it "has more to do with the ongoing war against financial privacy than with the war against international terrorism."

Newsworthy Others
Access to criminal databases for schools to perform background checks on employees (415-Ron Paul)

Calling on the League of Arab States to fight the genocide in Darfur (425-Ron Paul)

Tightening restrictions on GHB, the date-rape drug (423-Ron Paul)

I agree with Ron Paul's vote in every single instance, each either a pointless exercise in grandstanding or clearly outside the authority of Congress or the Federal Govt. Each member could chip in $75 apiece to get those medals privately minted. I'd rather use a spam filter and keep the First Amendment, thank you. Paul totally nailed it on the Financial Anti-Terrorism Act, which treats us all like we're terrorists. And telling the Arab States to combat genocide after we've slaughtered two million Iraqis since 1991 would be downright laughable, except no one in the Arab world is laughing. Thank God for Ron Paul. He's only a maverick because his colleagues are so craven and cowardly.

Posted by: W Gary Johnson on July 23, 2007 9:56 PM

Ron Paul is right on with all those votes especially the spam act. Ron Paul is the biggest supporter and he votes against any intervention of government on the internet. Ron Paul is also against "net neutrality" which is another attempt by government to regulate the internet.

Posted by: theropingeffect on July 23, 2007 10:46 PM

Well as a leftwinger who supports Ron Paul I don't agree with everything he says. Remember though he votes on principle not on public opinion. Out of all the candidates Ron cannot be percieved as pandering or flip-flopping. I have found however that if he explains his positions even a liberal like me can understand and be persuaded. Abortion is the perfect example. I have always deluded myself that the soul of the baby only exists after birth. Pauls example of how killing one minute prenatal is legal but one minute after is murder. How can you argue with that logic? This election will make people choose whether they are statist & imperialist or whether they are individualist and a citizen of a republic. This is not about parties and therefore bipartisanship. Peace.

Posted by: joshuabrucel on July 24, 2007 11:03 AM

Well as a leftwinger who supports Ron Paul I don't agree with everything he says. Remember though he votes on principle not on public opinion. Out of all the candidates Ron cannot be percieved as pandering or flip-flopping. I have found however that if he explains his positions even a liberal like me can understand and be persuaded. Abortion is the perfect example. I have always deluded myself that the soul of the baby only exists after birth. Pauls example of how killing one minute prenatal is legal but one minute after is murder. How can you argue with that logic? This election will make people choose whether they are statist & imperialist or whether they are individualist and a citizen of a republic. This is not about parties and therefore bipartisanship. Peace.

Posted by: joshuabrucel on July 24, 2007 11:04 AM

Advertisement

Re: Rosa Parks: It would have been good if you included the fact that Ron offered to pay $100 of his *own* money to fund the medal, which could have been covered if Congresspeople would have matched his contribution.

That makes a HUGE difference. He opposes the medal because it's not in the Constitution, but is happy to recognize Parks (and Ronald Reagan, and others) with money from his *own* pocket, rather than from the pockets of taxpayers.

I think it was important for you to include that...

Posted by: peterjaworski on July 24, 2007 1:52 PM