left arrow BackNext right arrow
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence

Time To Admit Oversight?

time-cover.jpg
COLD BUSTED Time
Is Time trying to bury the attorney general scandal that's seized Washington, D.C., for the past three months? In just the last week, new documents emerged contradicting Alberto Gonzales's account of his role in the firings, a low-level Department of Justice staffer announced her intent to plead the Fifth if asked to testify before Congress, and Justice officials admitted that it had misled Congress when it denied last month that Karl Rove played a role in deciding which U.S. attorneys got the boot. Yet the new issue of Time, on stands today, contains precisely zero stories on the scandal. Nothing. As though it's not happening.

You could chalk it up to atrocious news judgment, or laziness perhaps, but then there's the bizarre hostility that Time's editors have expressed regarding coverage of the firings. Back in January, Washington bureau chief Jay Carney dismissed them as run-of-the-mill "partisan hackery" and suggested that Josh Marshall, the proprietor of Talking Points Memo, was peddling conspiracy theories in pushing the story.

And just last weekend, Time's tight-faced managing editor, Richard Stengel, bemoaned the Democrats' insistence on investigating the firings on The Chris Matthews Show: "I am so uninterested in the Democrats wanting Karl Rove, because it is so bad for them. Because it shows business as usual, tit for tat, vengeance. That's not what voters want to see.... It's small-bore politics."

Both comments have generated heated reaction from left-wing blogs; Carney was forced to eat crow on Time's political blog (which he did graciously), Time's Ana Marie Cox fearlessly (foolishly?) took her boss Stengel to task, and Salon's Glenn Greenwald produced recent polls demonstrating that no less than 72 percent of the public is more interested than Stengel in the ongoing congressional investigations into the Justice Department.

You'd think that, given the flak Stengel and Carney have taken, they'd at least own up to their oversight in the new issue. Then again ... Aww! Penguins!

Comments

Be the first to respond. Post your comment below.

Advertisement


Post a comment

Your comment will not be visible for about a minute. If you don't see your comment when the page reloads, do not post it again. Reload the page in a minute, and you'll see it.

 


Eternal Plame

Scientology, Tom Cruise Lose Wealthiest Member to Rationality

Lieberman Checks McCain's Bearings, Plans Full Lube Job

Happy Mother's Day From Radar

Prince William's Overactive Joystick

Kim Kardashian's Ass Supports Burma Refugees

A Cow Poops! On TV! For Real!

Fox News Fires An Assistant Who Praised McCain

Second Life Turns Left

Snoop Dogg's Soap Star Rising


EXECUTIVE EDITOR:


EDITED BY:
, with

CONTRIBUTORS:
, , and others


Email us at:
tips@radaronline.com
or IM: TipRadar







Full Court Press
Frank Rich leads this week's list of Winners and Sinners

Bad Tattoos
From Dr. Phil to gay unicorns, the new book No Regrets looks at the worst tattoos on the planet

Unfinished Business
Everything you need to know about the R. Kelly sex trial

But Is It Obscene?
"Shock art" director Ira Isaacs is about to go on trial for obscenity

Grand Entry
Inside the world's elite secret societies





Sloane Crosley's book told with finger puppets
A publicist gets some puppeteering publicity

A friend's cancer is good for your health: study
Promising new findings

Scientology Recruitment Video
They almost had us there for a minute!

The Heinous Crimes of the Polygamist Wives
Let's just say the husbands aren't the only guilty ones

Higher Education, Lower Expectations
College sucks. But you already knew that