left arrow BackNext right arrow
< BACK TO Fresh Intelligence

Time Gets Crafty With Weepy Reagan Cover

time_reagantear_031507_FRES.jpg
TALE OF TEARS Reagan, Time
Is Time hoping a little controversy will draw attention to its redesign? The first new-look issue, on newsstands tomorrow, features what appears to be a photo of Ronald Reagan with a fat tear sliding down his cheek, illustrating the cover story, "How the Right Went Wrong." A somewhat cryptic credit in small type on the (revamped!) table of contents describes the image this way: "Photograph by David Hume Kennerly. Tear by Tim O'Brien." Nowhere does it specifically state that the cover is a photo illustration—in other words, that it's Photoshopped.

The use of a striking but fabricated image is consistent with the vision laid out by new managing editor Rick Stengel, who has said he wants Time to be more like The Economist—the British newsweekly that often features humorous photo illustrations on its cover. Still, one wonders: Is the wording of the credit enough to make its provenance clear to unsophisticated readers? And, equally important, how will the conservative acolytes who worship Reagan as a demigod feel about seeing a faked image of their hero used for a story criticizing the movement he championed?

UPDATE: A Time spokesperson responds with a statement: Time regularly runs conceptual covers, as we did last week with the "Verdict on Cheney" cover, depicting the vice president standing under storm clouds." (That image was far less subtle in its artificiality, but fair point.) "This week's cover image is clearly credited on the table of contents page, naming both the photographer of the Reagan photo and the illustrator of the tear."

Comments

Are they further imitating The Economist by giving Bill Kristol a weekly column for his right-wing fantasies?

TIME will never match The Economist for its superb international coverage, that's for sure.

Posted by: TeddyKGB on March 15, 2007 1:58 PM

Hey GaydarOnline, Nice to see you're now censoring people's comments. You don't mind calling Page Six's Corynne Steindler ugly (whereas she's actually a sweetie!), but when a commenter calls your pal, Time rag's P.R. queef Ali Zelenko ugly, you remove the post. Good luck with your censorial third attempt at a magazine.

Posted by: pinocchio on March 16, 2007 9:31 AM

Advertisement


Post a comment

Your comment will not be visible for about a minute. If you don't see your comment when the page reloads, do not post it again. Reload the page in a minute, and you'll see it.

 


Happy Independence Day From Radar

One Last Bear Rub To Round Out The Week

Southampton's $27 Vodka Soda

The First-Ever Vagina Spa

WSJ Prepares For Fourth of July With Insanity!

Mario Lopez Remains Partially Clothed, For Now

Rate Cuts At Gawker Media

C-Rod and A-Rod No Mas

McCain Likely Furious About McCain Rage Stories

Zimbabwe: How The Torturers Live


EXECUTIVE EDITOR:


MANAGING EDITOR:


CONTRIBUTORS:
, , and others


Email us at:
tips@radaronline.com
or IM: TipRadar







Games of Chaunce
New York's biggest gossip source is just an average schmo from Jersey

Confronting the Douchebag Plague
A helpful guide from the forthcoming handbook Hot Chicks With Douchebags

Full Court Press
Charles Kaiser on standout journalism in the latest New Yorker and this week's winners and sinners

RadLibs: This American Life Edition
Create your own Ira Glass narration with Radar's This American Life story generator

I, 'Mobot
A brief history of gay androids





Those Are Some Large Mammaries
Here's to firecrackers, beer, hot dogs, and, um, breasts

IT Would Rather Slap You Upside the Head
Why? Because you're dumb, period

Pixar's Next Effort
A post-WALL-E masterpiece

Douchiest Phone Message Ever
Now we've heard it all

From the Notebook of a Disturbed Child
A tragic tale drawn simple