Penis amputee Phillip Seaton is planning to appeal after losing his case against a doctor who removed a portion of his manhood without his permission during a routine circumcision.

The 64-year-old was left “disappointed” yesterday when a jury in Shelby County, Kentucky unanimously voted that Dr. John Patterson exercised appropriate care during the operation in October 2007.

But Seaton’s lawyer Kevin George told RadarOnline.com exclusively that “justice was not served” because his client “did not need to have his penis amputated.

A Kentucky man who sued a surgeon for amputating his penis without permission during a routine operation has lost his battle in court, RadarOnline.com has learned.

A jury in Shelby County, Kentucky, unanimously agreed on Wednesday that Dr. John Patterson exercised appropriate care when he removed a portion of Phillip Seaton's penis in October 2007 during a routine circumcision operation to treat inflammation, reported ABCNews.com.

The verdict appears to be influenced by the fact that Seaton, a truck driver who can not read or write, signed a consent form for a routine circumcision.

Instead of a cheated wife or jilted girlfriend, it was an esteemed surgeon who chopped off Phillip Seaton's penis and now the castrated man is seeking revenge in court.

Dr. John Patterson is being sued for removing Seaton's penis without his permission during a routine operation in October 2007, and the trial got underway in Shelby, Kentucky, on Monday, reported ABCNews.com.

Seaton, a truck driver who can't read or write, and his wife Deborah are seeking damages for "loss of service, love and affection," against the surgeon after the victim went in for a routine circumcision and came out a eunuch.